|
IU Technology Architecture Lodge
Random and not so random thoughts from Raymond Yee, primarily on the scholarly and educational use of the Web, libraries, educational technology, and information management
|
|
Home
Print friendly version
Scholar's Box Essay Series
Current Projects
Presentations and Papers
Work on Educational Technology Interop
RY's wiki
RY's personal blog
About This Site
About Raymond Yee
Interactive University
Contact RY
My blogroll
RSS 2.0 feed for this site
|
|
|
|
bricklin on segway
Dan Bricklin's essay on the disruptive nature of the Segway technology made me think about the long-term potential of the technologies we work on at the IU, which is currently in a primitive state. [link from scripting.com]
The slashdot thread on Lessig's Future of Ideas
Professors' Quest for Rights to Lectures Could Backfire, Law Student Warns (Chronicle of Higher Education). Corynne McSherry's book (Who Owns Academic Work: Battling for Control of Intellectual Property) is actually online -- thanks, Harvard University Press!.
Concerns about the future of ideas 
Recently, I've been blogging reviews and discussions about Lawrence Lessig's new book The Future of Ideas and Siva Vaidhyanathan's Copyrights and Copywrongs. Today, I bought a copy of Lessig's book -- and have both books now for some Christmas reading. I'm deeply concerned about the issue that is the subject of the books: that copyright and intellectual property rights are being more and more stringent at the expense of the public good, specifically that in the areas of learning and teaching. The beauty of the Web is that at its heart, it is a medium of generosity. Through legislation as DMCA and through heavy-handed digital rights management schemes, some players are trying to lock down content into hermetically sealed glass cases. I think that there is a profound threat to the academic world, in which ideas need to be shared. Certainly, this doesn't mean that people can copy stuff left, right, and center with no responsibility. Indeed, in the academic world, there is almost no greater sin than that of plagiarism: claiming authorship for something that you did not author, and thereby robbing the creator credit for his or her work. Academics want their ideas out there -- and the new technology might shut down that dissemination.
I think a lot about Bach when it comes to IP issues. A while back, I saw the connection between two JSBs: Johann Sebastian Bach and John Seely Brown. From Brown, I learned the notion of bricolage: Bricolage, a concept originally studied by Levi Strauss many years ago, relates to the concrete. It has to do with the ability to find something—an object, tool, piece of code, document—and to use it in a new way and in a new context. In fact, virtually no system today is built from scratch or first principles—like the way I used to build systems—but rather from finding examples of code on the Web, borrowing "that code," bringing it onto their site, and then modifying it to fit their needs. Today's systems are built up through an extensive sense of bricolage—by cobbling or "wiring" together code fragments and extending or modifying such fragments when necessary. The catch, however, is that if you are going to become a successful bricoleur of the 21st century, a bricoleur of the virtual rather than of the physical, than as you borrow things you have to be able to decide whether or not to believe or trust those things.
Does Bach perform bricolage? According to Audrey Wong: Burdened with tasks, deadlines, and their accompanying frustrations, Bach often relied on recycling his own compositions or borrowing music from his predecessors or his contemporaries. The practice of parodying as commonly practiced and accepted then would often qualify as plagiarism under the copyright laws of today. Without such laws to hamper him, Bach was a master of recasting, merging borrowed materials with his own ideas to produce works melodically more subtle and rhythmically more exciting. At times, Bach did just copy from other composers, though presumably only when the music suited his own refined taste.
My worry is that the genius such as that Bach's--which works on borrowing and quoting from the work of his predecessors and contemporaries -- will be stifled in the new age of digital control. Where's the university and the community of academics in this battle of the "future of ideas"?
More later as I read the books....
|
|
Nov
Jan
|
|
Last update:
Tuesday, December 18, 2001 at 5:46:11 PM.
This site is using the Vanilla Manila 1999 theme.
The opinions or statements expressed herein should not be taken as a position
of or endorsement by the University of California, Berkeley. Nor should the
opinions or statements expressed herein be taken as a position of or
endorsement of the University of California, Berkeley. Links on these pages to
commercial sites do not represent endorsement by the University of California
or its affiliates.
|