|
Today, I've been looking at specific examples of OpenURLs generated by Openly's OpenURL Referrer to understand the difference between v 0.1 and v 1.0 of OpenURLs.
In the tradition of google vanity searches, I will use a search for Yee and Beaubien on Google Scholar as an example. With the Openly's OpenURL Referrer extension installed, I get the following OpenURLs:
Now if I break down the pieces of respective OpenURLs to look how the key/value pairs compare between the two versions of OpenURL. The first table contains elements that have analogs between the two versions of OpenURL
| Thing |
0.1 |
Thing |
1.0 |
| resolver |
http://ucelinks.cdlib.org:8888/sfx_local |
1.0 resolver |
http://sirsi-resolver.sirsi.net/ |
| sid |
openly:openurlref |
rfr_id |
info:sid/openly.com:openurlref |
| genre |
article |
rft.genre |
article |
| title |
Library%20Hi%20Tech |
rft.jtitle |
Library%20Hi%20Tech |
| date |
2004 |
rft.date |
2004 |
| atitle |
A%20preliminary%20crosswalk%20from%20METS%20to%20IMS%20content%20packaging |
rft.atitle |
A%20preliminary%20crosswalk%20from%20METS%20to%20IMS%20content%20packaging |
| aulast |
Yee |
rft.aulast |
Yee |
| auinit |
R |
rft.auinit |
R |
There are also extra terms in the OpenURL 1.0:
| url_ver |
Z39.88-2004 |
| rft_val_fmt |
info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal |
| rfe_id |
http%3A%2F%2Fscholar.google.com%2Fscholar%3Fhl%3Den%26lr%3D%26q%3Dyee%2Bbeaubien%26btnG%3DSearch |
| rft_id |
http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ingenta.com%2Fisis%2Fsearching%2FExpand%2Fingenta%3Fpub%3Dinfobike%3A%2F%2Fmcb%2F238%2F2004%2F00000022%2F00000001%2Fart00008 |
| url_ctx_fmt |
info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx |
While we're at it, we should take a look at the type of URLs returned by GoogleScholar to get a feel for the type of screen-scraping that the extension has to do -- and the type of information that Google Scholar actually passes back:
Once I now have seen working OpenURLs up close, it's good to take a look at the full range of possibilities, look at the table I borrowed from Ex Libris - OpenURL Syntax:
These examples are instructive to me because they show working instances of OpenURLs, ones that don't try to show every possibility but just the core features.
Posted by Raymond Yee on 2/1/05; 5:37:54 PM
from the Unclassified dept.
Discuss
|